THE 4 MYTHS ABOUT INNOVATIVE THINKING - by Devesh Bhatt
MYTH 1 – THINK OUT OF THE BOX/THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX
The mind wanders and it can think anything and everything. The box is an illusion, a self created framework with the walls of Knowledge, Experience, Ability and Purpose. The lid is made up of our Assumptions that relate to our Fourth Wall, the Wall of Purpose. [I would get down to the Floor in MYTH 2].
The moment we have Purpose, we find ourselves in a closed Box. Any attempt to claw our way out (through Knowledge, Experience, Ability or Purpose] eventually leads us to relieve ourselves of our assumptions, hence open the lid and get out of the box. Once we are OUT OF THE BOX, it becomes a brick in one of our 4 walls in a New Found Box. (box within a box so to speak)
The first thought after this thought was “This is terrible”. It is an ever –repeating recursive loop. The more I try to understand this Box as an illusion, the more it persists in my mind keeping me confined.
I do not think I can ever “THINK OUT OF THE BOX” or "THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX AFTER HAVING CREATED THE LIMITATIONS OF MY PROBLEMS WITHIN THE BOX".
Firstly I am not sure whether it is your box or my box.
Secondly, I think my only concern should be “HOW TO GET OUT OF MY BOX” and I would have found the solution.
MYTH 2 – THE BOX IS AN ILLUSION
Indeed, this is a myth, the box very much exists (in our minds). It exists because it is real for each of us, defining our thoughts and actions.
What is an illusion for you , is a real framework for me, a framework that helps me learn new things. E.g. an illusion created by an adult is real enough for a child to believe in and help the child learn.
Another important point in this regard is this, every time I get out of my box, I find myself in a new box [So-called Enhanced walls of Knowledge, Experience and Ability + a Wall of New Purpose and a lid of new Assumptions]
The floor , so to speak, is another form of assumption upon which our 4 walls stand – I would term this floor as perspective [I would avoid saying practicality, logic, wisdom, sensibility etc as these things are frequently subject to an external scale of judgement/measurement or they are not absolute… perspective is intermittently absolute as it ceases to exist upon our own choosing or demise].
Therefore, we are all enslaved to the habit of creating frameworks, and with each learning, we change our master, promoting ourselves to the task of creating a new framework, a new box of temporary confinement. (Don't worry, this is just a myth--- everyone is free to ditch it in its entirety).
MYTH 3 – INNOVATIVE THINKING IS RARE
Innovation is nothing else but ways and means to get out of our box. It is a framework for quantifying and limiting our capacity and then surpassing it to make new frameworks (either for ourselves or for others).
We as humans constantly innovate, create our own frameworks, get out of the box and create new frameworks. The real question is , which aspect of our lives is subject to this innovation. If it is personal, what kind of frameworks are emerging that help us refine our lives and if we are aware of the ways we are being innovative in our professional life, is the framework worthy of realization as a new business /competitive advantage.
Being on a professional network, lets see innovation in a professional context.These frameworks become beneficial to career/business when they help create new frameworks of comfort for the consumer [i.e. a framework of a comfort zone that liberates the customer from the habit of creating frameworks but enslaves him/her/it to a comforting experience within the framework/box. [Now this is just a thought, not the blueprint for world domination].
By the same correlation, it maybe said that we innovate most in that aspect of our lives where we are most comfortable. At some stage or the other, we reach a comfort zone where we wish to reside forever, no more frameworks now. This is the mother fortress of comfort and if this is a stage achieved in our profession, then no one can move us out, even the boss will hand us “comfortable work” with a smile on his/her face.
Personally, I would rather seek such a fortress of comfort as my place of refuge, not anywhere near my quest for professional and personal growth. Having a comfort zone isn’t a bad thing, it’s like a small nap/a break before the next big leap of progress.
Then another thought occurs, priority must be to create such a refuge first, before any progress and then the dangers of being sucked into a recursive loop of seeking comfort.
Hence, only two choices exist, the recursive loop of creating frameworks or the recursive loop of sustaining comfort and being easy in an ever changing environment which demands ever changing frameworks.
MYTH 4 – THE MYTHS ARE NOT MYTHS BUT THEY ARE DEFINITE FRAMEWORKS
These myths (1,2,3 & 4) are not definite frameworks. They are a figment of my imagination. An illusory construct (which at the moment seem real to me) created for the purpose of satisfying my urge to write about Innovative Thinking.
This urge being deeply rooted in the fact that Innovative Solutions are equated with Innovative Thinking by the following :
- Clients demanding Innovative Solutions (Desirous is good, demanding is a bit challenging)
- Service providers promising Innovative Solutions
- Advisors/Coaches/mentors and aspiring mentors claiming that they can motivate others to develop Innovative Solutions.
- CURIOUS AUDIENCE WHICH ASSUMES THAT THEY ARE VOID OF INNOVATION AND NEED TO BE TAUGHT ABOUT IT. (NO YOU DON'T --- YOU HAVE ALWAYS BEEN INNOVATIVE , YOU JUST HAVEN'T COME ACROSS THE RIGHT PROBLEM TO SHOWCASE IT OR YOU HAVE UNDERVALUED A DESIRABLE OUTPUT AND GIVEN IT AWAY AS A DELIVERABLE -- ITS A PROBLEM OF EXPERIENCE & CONFIDENCE, NOT CAPABILITY)
Innovation and Innovative thinking are an everyday occurrence to all of us, but Innovative Solutions are rare – merely because it is an exercise to find a unique solution to a pre-defined problem. Usually problems seeking innovative solutions are rare because they are unique in nature and cannot be serviced by normally. If you have discovered a unique problem, that qualifies you to even solve it.
What I feel – Innovation is not a word meant to be thrown around as a pre-defined must have for a professional engagement. It is a criteria for evaluation and one of the best possible outcomes in any form of engagement, be it personal or a professional engagement.
"Articles from Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
View blogSome words once told, · Have now grown old. · They don't wish, · To live on aid. · In the name of lo ...
When you know all the ills around, · I am not the one you seek. · To execute judgement on people, · ...
The silence is gone. · Did she leave me behind? · Never to return. · Was I crude and unkind? · W ...
Related professionals
You may be interested in these jobs
-
Senior QA Engineer
Found in: Talent IN C2 - 6 days ago
Cloud Software Group Pune, India Full timeAbout The Product · TIBCO BusinessEvents is a declarative, distributed complex event processing platform covering multiple event processing tasks. TIBCO BusinessEvents allows you to abstract and correlate meaningful business information from the events and data flowing through y ...
-
Wordpress Developer
Found in: Talent IN 2A C2 - 1 week ago
Phoenix Branding Bengaluru, IndiaCompany Description · Phoenix Branding is a branding consultancy that provides services to improve brand awareness. Our services include consulting for branding, website planning, and marketing. · Role Description · This is a full-time on-site role in Bengaluru for a WordPress de ...
-
Solutions Consultant
Found in: Talent IN C2 - 6 days ago
Zycus Mumbai, India Full timeSolutions Consultant - (India) (SAL03669) · SalesMumbai, Bengaluru, PuneAbout UsZycus is a pioneer in Cognitive Procurement software and has been a trusted partner of choice for large global enterprises for two decades. Zycus has been consistently recognized by Gartner, Forrester ...
Comments
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
6 years ago #30
exactly
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #29
what can be a good yardstick?
Anne 🐝 Thornley-Brown, MBA
7 years ago #28
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #27
Thank you for the informative response. Food for thought, maybe logical correctness may limit functionality, maybe "100%" correctness may be an assumed limitation maybe when it comes to teams the term "our", the ownership factor could overweigh the functional aspect. Maybe the problems or the self imposed limitations are real and aid in caution or focus. As an individual, the illusion concept serves as a source of exploration. How can this avoid being a limitation in a team, because we cannot help but evaluate each other on the scale of "illusion". I still have t think on this but in case of team/collective effort i am assuming thag barriers be seen objectively and not as a source of illusions while we are problem solving. When the solution has worked, it is only then that we restrospectively ponder on its nature being an illusion. These are thoughts that emerge from your comments, not a critique in any sense but an attempt to see it in the light of teamwork . Thannks again, specially for adding another dimension to the "box" :)
Anne 🐝 Thornley-Brown, MBA
7 years ago #26
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #25
the box can be anything. Everyone does manage the mind eventually but does it serve the desired purpose. The three box solution seems useful in that regard for that purpose. Thanks for the link.
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #24
it is a great box . Thanks
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #23
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #22
only if we believe that the nox exists :)
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #21
thanks for reading . You posed very contemplative questions and the comment. Makes me wonder, everyone has a refuge, but how do we get their.. through the liberty of creativity or the denial of activity? Also can they be one in the same?
Liesbeth Leysen, MSc.
7 years ago #20
bless you Devesh Bhatt
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #19
have read and enjoyed it when you posted it.Thank You.
Sara Jacobovici
7 years ago #18
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #17
great to get it from a good writer.
Liesbeth Leysen, MSc.
7 years ago #16
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #15
we isolate to understand but integrate for functionality, after all parts of the same brain which must utilise all options. I can think, I can feel, I can assess with sensory inputs almost instantly. Why suppress one for the other, unless I presume them in conflict.
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #14
additionally to justify a thought? I think that usually both processes work simultaneously and in coherence. One preceding the other is a way of prep work for uncertainty, On the other hand maybe I am using the process that you state.
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #13
I have a lot to read on, specially across your links. I said logical because you have designed things. I haven't designed anything except for writings and business proposals. Now I am trying to crawl back to the simple. You were not IT, but you are. I am not IT, I just got interested from the client side. I am interested in product design specific to a particular product, a specific concept , the dream concept among many utility based ideas . I still have to grasp an understanding for all that you have written, I just wanted to understand if I started ok. Initially I tend tend to have a biased point of view, courtesy the limitations of my understanding.
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #12
has to be assessed by trials of deliverable add ons to see whether consumer assessment is correct. If the evaluation is correct...The desirable maybe introduced as a standard add-on or a separate product altogether. Since non IT companies have less risk appetite, this was the safe route I got conditioned too, but it limited the transcendence into core technology segments.
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #11
you started from the logical point of creation. I was thrust into comparatives and competitive intelligence. Plus , unlike the common Indian attraction to IT , I was in non IT. So let me understand your article with some points of reference. Maybe I can start from their. It all boils down to utility,basis of your standards and basis for my deliverables (as an observer of current feasibility and competitiveness). You state innovation as infrastructure...Governance standards. I view innovation as utility + scalability... There maybe a 1000 solutions that serve a utility but the infrastructure standards and governance actually additionally provide for scalability. From the point of view of market sustenance, scalability is contd
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #10
www.bebee.com/producer/@devesh-bhatt/truth-by-devesh-bhatt
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #9
points of reference become limits of relevance. True, the positive paradox gets one to surpass the limit and realise it to be a starting point.
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #8
exactly. They re just myths :)
Lisa Gallagher
7 years ago #7
Great points!
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #6
as a service provider you must be well aware, the obsession with complications and logical consistentcy of senior management and the vulnerability of a simple proposal which is picked up for free :) This serves that purpose.
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #5
the idea was this. I can sell an idea and I can convince people and earn money. I really want to solve problems, do stuff and improve outcomes. People still see me as a good sell talker, but talk and walk are not exclusive, why divide them just for the sake of margins?
Lisa Gallagher
7 years ago #4
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #3
Donna-Luisa Eversley.... its always nice to break the box.. always works either from the inside or outside. Irene Hackett.. you got the overthinking satire right on. These are just myths :)
CityVP Manjit
7 years ago #2
I looked at the comments from the original airing of this piece so you are free to add to them - but essentially I really don't want to read this and unless my prof tells me that this is my homework assignment - this falls outside what I want to pay attention to because a man's gotta know his limitations as good old Clint once famously said. Finito. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/4-myths-innovative-thinking-devesh-bhatt
Devesh 🐝 Bhatt
7 years ago #1
Aurorasa Sima, may i get to know what you think?