The Emperor May Be a Bot ... But He Still Has No Clothes
SAY IT LOUDLY AND OFTEN ENOUGH AND PEOPLE MAY BELIEVE YOU...
Autodesk, a long-standing developer of 2D and 3D drafting and design software, recently announced it plans to release a new version of its Autodesk Virtual Agent (AVA) avatar.
The company says that AVA’s CGI makeover will turn her into a hyper-detailed, 3D-rendered character – what Soul Machines calls a "digital human".
No doubt the Prophets (Profits?) of AI will herald AVA as a further step in the march to full-fledged Artificial Intelligence and the creation of robots (both physical and virtual) that display "human" characteristics.
Well, it's time to stop taking what they say at face value and instead look at what they're actually presenting as examples...
When you do that, you find that the reality rarely if ever lives up to the claims being made. When it comes, for example, to AVA, my reaction is, "Is that the best you can do?"
Admittedly, AVA is better than an animated cartoon character. But it (not she) is still light years away from even approaching the nuanced play of human facial expressions.
Sure, a real, live AVA would be a sultry beauty. But as it (not she) stands, it's a face only her design engineers could love.
Take a look for yourself and let me know what you think. ― Phil Friedman
Information and video credit: FastCompany.net
Author's Notes: This piece is the second in a series on Artificial Intelligence that I am writing from a layman's point of view, one that is not filtered through the eyes and judgment of someone with a vested interest in the hyping of AI. If you'd care to read the other articles in the series, they are:
1) “Artificial Un-Intelligence”
2) "The Emperor May Be a Bot... But He Still Has No Clothes"
3) "The Robots Are Coming, the Robots Are Coming..."
4) “The Prophets VS the Profits of Ai”
5) "The Anthropomorphization of Ai"
If you enjoyed this post and would like to receive notifications of my writing on a regular basis, simply click the [FOLLOW] button on my beBee profile. Better yet, elect there to follow my blog by email. As a writer-friend of mine says, you can always change your mind later.
As well, if you feel this piece is of value, please like it and share it around to your network — whether on beBee, LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, or Google+, provided only that you credit me properly as the author, and include a live link to the original post.
About me, Phil Friedman: With some 30 years background in the marine industry, I've worn different hats — as a yacht designer, boat builder, marine operations and business manager, marine industry consultant, marine marketing and communications specialist, yachting magazine writer and editor, yacht surveyor, and marine industry educator. I'm also trained and experienced in interest-based negotiation and mediation. In a previous life, I was formally trained as an academic philosopher and taught logic and philosophy at university.
Text Copyright 2017 by Phil Friedman — All Rights Reserved
#AI #ARTIFICIALINTELLIGENCE #FUTURISM #PREDICTINGTHEFUTURE #CHATBOT #ROBOTS #SHOWMETHEINTELLIGENCE
Articles from Phil Friedman
View blogWHERE THE CONVERSATION ABOUT YACHTS AND THE YACHTING INDUSTRY IS LIVELY, CANDID, AND 100% INSIDER... ...
GRUMPY AND GROUCHY TAKE A CRITICAL LOOK AT THE HONEY FACTORY... · Preface: · When Jim Murray and I f ...
HEADED TO THE YARD FOR A REFIT? AVOID THE SHOALS OF UNANTICIPATED COSTS ... · Avert grounding on the ...
Related professionals
You may be interested in these jobs
-
Qa test automation
Found in: Lensa US 4 C2 - 8 hours ago
Info Origin Inc. Atlanta, United StatesFull job description · QA Test Automation Analyst || Contract || Remote · Local candidate of Georgia state requirement. · 10 years of experience in software testing or other applicable Information Technology experience that directly aligns with the specific responsibilities for ...
-
Lead Embedded Engineer
Found in: beBee S2 US - 3 weeks ago
Honeywell Norcross, United States OTHERJoin the industry leader to design the next generation of breakthroughs · When you join Honeywell, · you become a member of our global team of thinkers, innovators, dreamers and · doers who make the things that make the future. That means changing the way we · fly, fueling jets i ...
-
Manufacturing Dispatcher
Found in: Lensa US P 2 C2 - 5 days ago
Lockheed Martin Corporation Oldsmar, United States**Description:** At Lockheed Martin, we are passionate about innovation and integrity\. We believe that by applying the highest standards of business ethics and forward\-thinking, everything is within our capacity – and yours as a Lockheed Martin employee\. · Lockheed Martin valu ...
Comments
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #23
Yes, Debesh, they will use our time to train the bots so they can increase their profits. Not the bots’ fault though. Cheers!
Debesh Choudhury
6 years ago #22
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #21
Bill Stankiewicz
6 years ago #20
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #19
SHOWMETHEINTELLIGENCE. Installment II of the series... https://plus.google.com/u/0/collection/kmntUE
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #18
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #17
Thank you, Pamela \ud83d\udc1d Williams, for reading and the kind words. I share your concern for our society if we continue to buy the BS being fomented by the Prophets and Profits of Artificial Intelligence. What we are seeing is a blatant propaganda campaign to convince us that not only can machine intelligence outperform human intelligence, but that machine intelligence will be "objective" and unaffected by the biases built into it, both intentionally and inadvertently, by programmers and engineers. The situation is a mirror of what has happened with the explosion of "apps" to choose what we read, what music we listen to, what schools and cars and clothes and foods are best for us. As though these "smart" apps are neutral and without flaws or built-in biases. It's all a pile of crap. Which becomes evident if you have had any experience with a Customer Service Bot -- which takes at least five times as long to resolve your problem if indeed it ever resolves the problem at all. An intelligent human works are five times the speed of such Bots because the human exercises judgment and understands the objective. The same is true of the programs that are supposed to allow a single customer service representative to talk to multiple customers at the same time. When you look closely you see the purported improvement in efficiency is a complete hoax. All these programs or bots do is slow down the rep-to-customer interaction by delaying the serial interchange. With the result that a five-minute conversation with a customer service representative (or bot) takes 20 to 30 minutes. But in the meantime, the profits for the software firms selling this bill of goods to other companies continue to pile up.
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #16
Lada \ud83c\udfe1 Prkic -- A bot can be clever, But an android is better. As a bot is almost never A real go-getter. Cheers!
Lada 🏡 Prkic
6 years ago #15
It's all clear to me now. You're a Cleverbot. That's why I like interacting with you. :)
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #14
I agree, Jerry Fletcher, Here are some questions I ask immediately upon being connected a customer "service" center or call desk. 1) Where are you? If the answer is in a country that is culturally widely divergent from min (the U.S.), I politely say goodbye and try another means, since my experience is that, in some cultures, the propagated "customer service" ethic is to protect the company and keep it from spending any money, all in preference to actually satisfying the customer. 2) Are you a real person or a computer? If a computer, again I hang up. Because the vast majority of my experience is that I am about to enter upon a 20 or 30-minute conversation that will end in my being told to call another number and speak to a representative. The pipe dream of Bots to solve customer problems remains just that, a pipe dream. And if you want to achieve peace in your life, that is one pipe you will not smoke. Cheers and thanks for joining the conversation.
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #13
Wayne Yoshida, the link you supplied is a great read. I recommend it to all who are interested in this topic.Thanks. https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/the-uncanny-valley
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #12
Very good questions, Robert Cormack. As I said below I much prefer the MS Paperclip. No complaints there concerning harassment -- unless being used occasionally to pick my teeth counts. Cheers!
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #11
Okay, Lada \ud83c\udfe1 Prkic, here is where the rubber meets the road (to use an engineering-related metaphor). What would you say if I disclosed that I am a Social Media Bot that's been in a beta testing and self-learning phase for ten years? :-)
Lada 🏡 Prkic
6 years ago #10
Phil, I just like the idea of experiencing the interaction with an automaton. AutoCAD becomes more and more complicated, and its user-help database is not better or worse compared to other complex software. We can always have YouTube for additional instructions. :)
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #9
I prefer the MS Paper Clip, Wayne Yoshida, Autodesk can put as much as it wants into the development of AVA, but that won't help a whit if they do not improve the quality of their user-help database and the explanations and instructions contained therein. Not to mention, if the user-help were more complete and useful, I wouldn't need AVA or anyone else. I can read pretty well. Don't you think? If so, AVA is a lot of investment for a parlor trick.
Jerry Fletcher
6 years ago #8
Lada 🏡 Prkic
6 years ago #7
Lada 🏡 Prkic
6 years ago #6
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #5
Right on, Paul \.. Direct cloud-resident program work ell in specific circumstances and certain jobs. But you can’t truly run most businesses on non-local softeare in my experience. Autodesk is looking to use AVA as a virtual user-support person in order to avoid msintsining huge call centers or vast contractor networks. The concept is brilliant. Replace unhelpful outsourced call centers with an unhelpful but infinitely polite and patient Bots. Cheers!
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #4
Right on, Paul \. Direct cloud-resident program work ell in specific circumstances and certain jobs. But you can’t truly rin most businesses on non-local softeare in my experience. Autodesk is looking to use AVA as a virtual user-support person in order to avoid msintsining huge call centers or vast contractor netseorks. The concept is brilliant. Replace unhelpful outsourced call centers with an iunhelpgul but infinitely polite and patient Bot. Cheers!
Wayne Yoshida
6 years ago #3
Robert Cormack
6 years ago #2
Phil Friedman
6 years ago #1
Claire, you are correct. The general shift from the supply of discrete software that resides locally in your computer to the "supply of service" via a real-time internet connection is put sh$t. I loved Adobe Acrobat 9 which resided on my computer for a decade. Adobe Acrobat DC is anti-intuitive, confusing, cumbersome, and craps out every time you lose the WiFi or internet connection. I use AutoCAD 7 happily for years. I hate AutoCAD Mobile. And Word 365 is not anywhere as quick as Word use to be when it resided entirely on my machine. https://www.bebee.com/producer/@friedman-phil/not-all-clouds-have-a-silver-lining