Joel Anderson

7 years ago · 6 min. reading time · ~10 ·

Blogging
>
Joel blog
>
Irrelativity: Are we being crowdsourced into irrelevance through a war on words and artful use of information?

Irrelativity: Are we being crowdsourced into irrelevance through a war on words and artful use of information?

b0fe0d02.jpg


"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way - in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.”

Charles Dickens “A Tale of Two Cities”

Race:

Energy:

Climate:

Culture:

Education:

Health Care:

Global Food:

Immigration:

Government:

Environment:

Foreign Policy:

Veterans Affairs:

National Security:

Terrorism and the Long War:

In the book “Disconnected: Haves and Have-nots in the Information Age” William Wresch discusses the power of information, where “In the Information Age, information is power. Who produces all that information, how does it move around, who uses it, to what ends, and under what constraints?  Who gets that power? And what happens to the people who have no access to it?” With respect to the latter question, I might add “And what happens to the people who have lost any semblance of control over it?”

This is not a sales pitch for this book or the myriad of others that discuss the power, use and misuse of information.

It is a discussion on the subtlety of the underlying theme of being disconnected. Intentionally, unintentionally, by design or by happenstance? Might we just be under the spell of those who understand the power of information, the power of its divisive use and the potential influence that information has on dividing us through the relatively new phenomena of crowdsourcing? And, in looking at how information is used more pervasively than ever, how by design and the artful use of insight and knowledge management we may find ourselves being played in a way that is making most if not all of us irrelevant. Is that what we really want? I don’t have all the answers, and maybe for that matter I don’t have any, but I am curious.

This is a short discussion about how we all, collectively, need to realize the power of information and a troubling trend in its use. It is one opinion on how, if we do not stand up and embrace its power and influence and use it to our advantage, we just may be experiencing an unintended consequence of being manipulated down a path leading us to obscurity.

It is not my intent to conduct a deep dive into each of the topics above, nor is it my intent to create yet another rant on one side of the political fence or another. Rather, I will merely bring some general observations and thoughts on the subject and let you all come to your own conclusions.

So let us begin this discussion with a look back at Charles Dickens lead in to A Tale of Two Cities. Think about it. Written in 1859, might this serve as an example for us all to reflect upon the context of our current state of affairs? As George Santayana is attributed as saying “those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. “ Regardless of your opinion of his philosophy, might we be headed down a path where we are not only repeating the past, but quite possibly being led down an information super-hiway of obfuscating rhetoric and emotional sensationalism towards a future not entirely of our choosing? A hiway fueled by those who want to own and drive information in a manner that serves only to bolster their power, while destroying any semblance of common sense, civility or meaningful dialogue? What happens when the information haves get to the point where they can manipulate information and by extension each of us knowing full well that through the artful manipulation of data and information we get so bogged down in the “currency” of it all, that we fail to learn from the past, let alone intelligently think things out for the future?

With that as a backdrop, then let’s take a look at some of the major issues driving the political scenes of the day. There are others out there, but I have chosen just a few that seemingly creep their way into our everyday lives, into our discussions, and in many respects a global dialogue of unfolding change. Race, energy, climate, culture, education, health care, global food, immigration, government, environment, foreign policy, veterans affairs, national security, terrorism and the long war. Yes there are challenges and issues for each one of these, but let’s regain our agility and demand/expect more as we assess each and determine plausible solutions for each with knowledge, insight and common sense.  Let’s stop allowing symptomatic sensationalism drive the train and take a look at the illness (real or perceived) and come up with logical, long standing, sustainable approaches for a better world. In demanding more, and in using information to advantage, let’s stop the madness of allowing entities to merely confuse issues, tap into our emotions and become the taxi drivers of information and by default, dictating our place in it all. I wonder what Clausewitz might say if he were able to reflect on the “uber” power of information and its corresponding friction and fogginess?

“ All appears so simple, all the requisite branches of knowledge appear so plain, all the combinations so unimportant, that, in comparison with them, the easiest problem in higher mathematics impresses us with a certain scientific dignity.”

It seems like almost every issue, every discussion, every debate, every post, every breaking news story immediately delves into a subjective yin and yang and back and forth where those who control the information understand that in so controlling and owning it, they can portray any issue with their own set of agenda behind it all and artfully lead us down the road of their choosing.  By design or merely as a result of the ubiquity of it all, friction and fog become ever present in the world of information and the profoundness of it all that is changing the very fabric and landscape of our globalness.

Change is never easy, but I for one think that we all are much smarter than to be allowed to be herded in this direction or that direction like puppets on a string. Addressing any issue is hard work, but I for one think we are smarter than merely allowing ourselves to sit passively by and listen to all the Lip Smackin rhetoric going on that seemingly has the ulterior motive of dividing and conquering.

Why then the crowdsourcing analogy linkage to irrelativity? Because if we follow what is happening in our world today and allow it to continue unchecked/unabated then we merely allow those who control information to perpetuate our crowdsourcing through its use to lead us down whichever path they chose. Do we truly want to be crowdsourced into oblivion?

In watching how some use information to advantage, they have made it clear that its use is merely a passive aggressive means to an end. In using information as a tool to manipulate, divide and conquer might its use just be an orchestrated approach to enhance the best interest of those who “have” control of the information not for the mainstream of society? In some respects it just makes one think, or then again maybe not.

Why is it, for example, that we allow those who control information to misuse it and not hold them accountable? Why is it, that we find it so easy to call out one entity or another as being hate mongerers, facists, etc….and provide free passes and just give in to the others on both sides of the fence that pathologically lie, lie, lie? Ok, maybe lie is too strong of a word. How about we say use information to twist the truth to where they aren’t totally telling the truth while not totally lying in the process.  Then again, maybe lie is a good word to use in the context of this discussion as folks carefully bait and switch us, or present information in an unaccountable form of plausible deniability for any issue of their choosing where their ends justify the means.  Come on folks, we deserve and can do better than allowing this absurdity to continue unchecked.

In using information to advantage, have some created an illusion where in having access to “it,” and where we all believe we are so tied in and informed that we don’t realize that the reality just may be the opposite. Through this illusion, have we created a conundrum where the majority of us have unwittingly become information “have nots.”  The value of the internet and other sources of information is that we all have the intellect and the common sense to read between the lines, the jockeying and purveying of information and the disinformation, the baiting and switching and the plausible deniability of it all. I say this because so much information is seemingly designed to foment anger and keep us distracted, divided and irrelevant while those who ultimately control the use of information lumber on with their agenda.

So as I said earlier, I don’t have all the answers, and maybe for that matter I don’t have any, but I am curious. I for one will continue to use my voice, compile my information and use my intellect with the ultimate goal of understanding it all in an effort to make a difference. I will not allow those with an agenda lead me towards “irrelativity.” I will not allow them, whomever “they” may be, to succeed in doing so. I think that individually and collectively, we are better than that. And as Robert Frost would say:

“Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—

I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference.”

You decide.



For other works by Joel Anderson: https://www.bebee.com/@joel-anderson

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author


 

Comments

Joel Anderson

6 years ago #19

#30
The journey of a thousand miles begins with one step. Lao Tzu

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #18

Here is to all the original, creative maladjusted non-conformist out there. “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” “This hour in history needs a dedicated circle of transformed nonconformists … Human salvation lies in the hands of the creatively maladjusted,” Martin Luther King Jr.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #17

#24
I just don't want to end up in virtual car, at the grocery store, or at the restaurant and find that I found myself in a location not of my choosing. Finding myself only to be confronted with an unending plethora of overwhelming distractions and choices. Find myself at a place where someone has effectively channeled me into a mindless approach of how to think, how to engage, how to collaborate, and using my intellect to pick and choose. Whether I can control it or not, I just cannot sit passively in the passenger seat and relinquish its ownership and control if it is in my power to do so. Rather than be a back seat driver, I want to be an active participant; reflecting, engaging and collaborating on the journey.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #16

#24
How we decide to approach it or not, will prove to be interesting as we decide to retain some modicum of ownership, or relinquish control and influence over the information that is driving us in one direction and/or another. It will be an interesting journey. Whether that journey is complex or simple and we take it standing or sitting, it is my hope that we all actively understand how we leverage the power and use of information to advantage. I fully appreciate that there are times when others will drive a discussion, come up with a new idea, have an opinion on something and will try to influence thoughtful and productive dialogue. I also appreciate that far too often, there is an agenda behind the use of information that just may not be in the best interest of anyone other than those who are trying control information and in such control, have mastered an artful approach to crowdsourcing us into being irrelevant.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #15

#24
Thanks Deb Helfrich I agree. Despite the real and potential contradictions of the complex and simplicity driving any topic I am committed to a lifelong approach to learning, reflecting and better understanding the mechanics behind it all. As I thought through the recent comments, I revisited my thesis topic: "Convergence: Information Technology’s Impact and Changes on Organizational and Social Structures" that I wrote back in 2000 and served as a means to distill some of the summary of events in my comment at #23. Much has happened in the past 16 years and much is yet to be seen.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #14

The world of information, knowledge, insight and the resulting convergence of it all over the past 500+ years has had significant impact and change on the world (organizations and social structures) as we know "it." In many respects, the essence of convergence began in 1436 with a technological breakthrough contributed by Gutenberg. That convergence continued and actually accelerated in the 1800's with things like Morse and the telegraph, Bell and his telephone, Babbage and his "difference engine." During the last century there were things like ENIAC, ARPANET and then the exponential growth and impact of the internet and global communication continued to influence the changing landscape of information--its use, ownership and its misuse. My point in this is that as with the likes of Dickens, Santayana, and Wresch I would merely say that in the messiness of it all, the process of and ability to reflect is becoming a lost art. In some respects we are increasingly being handed information on a menu that is artfully designed to placate our individual pallets in a world of simplistic snacks that trivializes our intellect, serves to divide and distract us, and in some respects limits our ability to put things in context, see the bigger picture and assess/analyze it all. Whether by design or just a matter of shere volume, it is troubling to see the trend of marshaling all of us simpletons towards the future. Whatever the construct of the command and control "model" is or will be-- heirarchical/napoleonic, matrixed or hybrid variation still unfolding, we have to do better in educating ourselves, our youth and yes @CityVP Manjit and @Deb Helfrich condition ourselves to be more dynamic, reflective, collaborative, responsive and in control of it all so that we can truly be the "change we want to see" not the change that is foisted upon us.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #13

The world of information, knowledge, insight an dthe resulting convergence of it all over the past 500+ years has had significant impact and change on the world (organizations and social structures) as we know "it." In many respects, the essence of convergence began in 1436 with a technological breakthrough contributed by Gutenberg. That convergence continued and actually accelerated in the 1800's with things like Morse and the telegraph, Bell and his telephone, Babbage and his "difference engine." During the last century there were things like ENIAC, ARPANET and then the exponential growth and impact of the internet and global communication continued to influence the changing landscape of information--its use, ownership and its misuse. My point in this is that as with the likes of Dickens, Santayana, and Wresch I would merely say that in the messiness of it all, the process of and ability to reflect is becoming a lost art. In some respects we are increasingly being handed information on a menu that is artfully designed to placate our individual pallets in a world of simplistic snacks that trivializes our intellect, serves to divide and distract us, and in some respects limits our ability to put things in context, see the bigger picture and assess/analyze it all. Whether by design or just a matter of shere volume, it is troubling to see the trend of marshaling all of us simpletons towards the future. Whatever the construct of the command and control "model" is or will be-- heirarchical/napoleonic, matrixed or hybrid variation still unfolding, we have to do better in educating ourselves, our youth and yes CityVP Manjit condition ourselves to be more dynamic, reflective, collaborative, responsive and in control of it all so that we can truly be the "change we want to see" not the change that is foisted upon us.

CityVP Manjit

7 years ago #12

#20
Yes Deb, and that is why the actual practice of Gandhi's popular refrain "be the change you want to see in the world" is such great definer for personal action. I do actually like Margaret Wheatley's way of looking at "what works" because that accords with what I want to do which is to master health rather than illness. If I was able to change one thing from my student days, it would have been to reverse my outlook that was taught to view life from it downside, rather than life from its upside. It is that idea that if we have reached the bottom, the only way left is UP. As for the test culture, yesterday I got involved with a case competition team and so now I am off to the races reflecting about competitions, whether they are case, contests or club competitions https://www.bebee.com/producer/@cityvp/teams-judges-and-industries This is my own disposition, jump into that which I have instant affinity with on experiencing it first hand and then quickly immerse myself in that whole new blue ocean.

CityVP Manjit

7 years ago #11

#18
For a long time Joel human beings have been fighting the barbaric imposition of the industrial age mind, but now as we move into the knowledge age, what is in much shorter supply is reflective experience. I never understood why HR folk are so blinkered to pursue policies of employee engagement initiatives to engage people, when those very policies often end up with the reverse outcome of disengagement. What would happen if they instead focused on employee reflection initiatives, then it is the employee who owns engagement. Command and control was the natural by-product of the industrial revolution, but now the knowledge revolution is a foot, we are no longer operating on the linear model of rote education, but the dynamic pattern recognition of noticing. The irony here being that rote education is not actually an education, employee engagement is not actually engagement and as we move from the industrial age to the knowledge-based age, the proportion of reflective ability must be the new form of initial engagement, for it is far from being the natural disposition of the vast majority. I now do see you are referring to engagement but there needs to be a revolution in how we view engagement, in parallel to the change in times.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #10

Thanks CityVP Manjit for the thoughtful responses. I dont disagree with your point of difference. I do find it interesting in the world of globalization, perviasive information, social media and the internet of things (IoT) or as I refer to it as the Thing of Things (ToT) information and its use are, or in some respects may be fundamentally challenging the essence of our being. Whether passive or active, sitting our standing my point in using the the phrase "if we do not stand up" was more of an attempt at a metaphor for engagement rather than the actual act of standing up an in your face stand up and fight perspective. That act may be relevant and germane in some cases, where as you have said, sometimes it is and will be better to sit down. There are some many aspects and nuances to it all, that I truly appreciate you taking the time to read it and whether your sitting or standing, to engage and explore this phenomena.

CityVP Manjit

7 years ago #9

A point of difference I have with Joel are the words "if we do not stand up". I think we have to sit down, even if what bothers us about the information age wants us to stand up, the urge to stand in a crowdsourced world inevitably leads not to standing but grandstanding. To sit and observe is a challenge in a world whizzing with information flows. If we are caught in that information current we are then fighting spin while being spun. This is the age where the Fool on the Hill is the observer that can sit still, at a time when everyone can stand. In that listening and observing, if it fundamentally transforms us, the world is better of with this one addition. The stand and fight mentality worked well in the counter-culture of the 60's but it is impotent in a network. How I individually process diverse views is the basis of a learning politics and not a winner-takes-all politics. How we each learn is our win and as we connect information flow with life flow - then and only then do we begin to take baby steps towards renaissance.

CityVP Manjit

7 years ago #8

There is a masters degree offered in political science, there is a masters degree offered in public administration, but we don't have that degree that politicians should earn and that is a Masters in Servant Leadership. We carry the entire weight of democracy in the casting of a single vote and we still use archaic forms of democracy to manage 21st Century life. Even a roll call for a vote is a long queue, in an age where digital democracy provides more efficient ways of making the political process more cost effective. The political process is not cost effective for the same reason that healthcare is not cost effective, or that education is not cost effective, because constituencies of special interest and professional groups continue to add burdens rather than improve service, they look after their own and we become puppets to their theater. The political process itself does not have to be political, it has to be systematic and why is that system broken? Just as are other systems that confuse systemic improvement with political manipulation. We become feed-stock to the political process rather individuals who are seeds of transformation. The two paragraphs I have written above do nothing to change ANY political system on the Earth and when I now bring all of this down to the unit level of a human being (which is me) what then does this contribute to the power of information? I do like Marshall McLuhan's question about living in the electric age, which is asking a fundamental question "What is Going On?". Yet only a few people like Joel or people who comment on this actually have the desire to explore that question. I am here because that question is very important to me, but not as a political question, but a systematic one - a system whose outputs are wisdom.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #7

#13
Deb Helfrich Looking forward to reading it. I work with faculty here on a variety of related topics germane to the plains and elsewhere around our globe. A flatlander at heart, albeit the 7th flattest state in the US. One example is related to the Konza Prairie and the last stand f the tall grass prairie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy21uSG3ma8 And believe it or not, we actually have hills in Kansas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint_Hills

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #6

#10
Thanks Deb Helfrich as usual spot on. Funny you raised the cow farting issue as there was an article earlier on climate change where cow burping and swamp gas was identified as the true and real culprit behind the climate and global warming issue. As with you I will continue to raise my voice and use my intellect to continue on my quest for insight and knowledge on my approach to better understand the world we live in. And one other thank you, I now have another good book to read.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #5

#7
Thanks Josh. Truly appreciate the vote of confidence. Press ahead I will. All the best to you and keep making a difference; one person--one step at a time.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #4

#6
Thanks Aurorasa Sima Sorry for being a little slow on responding. Change is never easy and sometimes it just seems like globally, we are just complacent about it all.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #3

Just a follow on thought to some of the craziness and scrum soccer going on in our world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowd_psychology

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #2

#1
Thanks Brian. Agreed.

Joel Anderson

7 years ago #1

#2
Thanks John. Well said.

Articles from Joel Anderson

View blog
5 years ago · 1 min. reading time

Flawless · Beauty · Ingenious · Delicate · Elaborate · It is · It isn’t · It is real · It is fal ...

6 years ago · 1 min. reading time

“The clock is running. Make the most of today. Time waits for no man. Yesterday is history. Tomorrow ...

6 years ago · 4 min. reading time

Recently I scanned a quote from an article by some really important guy on LinkedIn about wireless n ...

Related professionals

You may be interested in these jobs

  • FYZICAL Therapy & Balance Centers

    Clinical Director

    Found in: Lensa US 4 C2 - 9 hours ago


    FYZICAL Therapy & Balance Centers McAllen, United States

    Exponentially increase the value of your Physical Therapy degree when you join FYZICAL, the nation's leading PT company, as our Clinical Director in McAllen, TX · Our independently owned practice offers the perfect solution for someone who would enjoy the freedom to innovate and ...

  • CURAtive

    ObGyn

    Found in: Lensa US P 2 C2 - 5 days ago


    CURAtive Joplin, United States

    ObGyn physician job in Missouri : · We are seeking an Obstetrician-Gynecologist to provide weekend coverage at our well-established facility in Missouri. This opportunity is ideal for a professional looking to supplement their practice and provide general OBGYN care to the commu ...


  • Hayman Daugherty Associates, Inc Raleigh, United States

    Seeking a board eligible or board certified Psychiatrist to join an established practice and practice near Raleigh, North Carolina. New graduates, J1 visa, H1B candidates are encouraged to apply. Full time position focused on providing outpatient psychiatry care in a medication m ...