Why LinkedIn Is Fading Away (Even though It May Still Be Useful)
Back in the day, when Social Media (SM) were something new and untainted, there was some diversity present, even if there weren't that many platforms around. When LI entered the picture, it brought about a very important niche in the SM spectrum: a social medium for professionals. Unlike FB, it targeted a different kind of users, those willing to share something insightful and more useful than cat pictures and funny videos. The fact that Google+ tried to copy it to some extent some years later, goes to show that it was doing something right. However, Google+ ended up veering more towards FB instead, showing that perhaps LI wasn't doing its job that well after all!
Fortunately, once LI reached enough users, it attracted the interest of a certain tech giant, that went on to buy it. It's not clear if this was because LI felt it had reached its peak or because it just didn't care any more. So, the fact that it was all downhill from there can't be attributed entirely to MS taking over the SM platform. After all, despite what people think about the tech giant, it knows what it's doing and really makes an effort to improve things (even if it sometimes fails miserably, as in the case of Skype, which is now slightly better than a tin-and-chord phone, when it comes to quality).
Perhaps the root of the issue with LI lies in the fact that it did (and does) a terrible job at promoting some of its users (the so-called influencers), or assessing the content quality. Although in the past couple of years it's made an effort to improve itself through acquiring feedback from its most engaged users (I was one of them), it never really acted on the most promising feedback it got. In fact, over the past few months it got worse, as it was clearly imitating other more successful SM, such as FB (even if the latter has the same quality issues as LI). This was reflected in the various posts that contaminate the web with their presence, things like highly biased articles, sensational posts closer to click-bait than an actual article, and a lot of misinformation.
The fact that there are now a lot of fake users on that social medium goes on to show that LI cares mainly about getting more content online, more shares, more likes, and more "articles", rather than anything resembling quality content (or even original content for that matter). Nevertheless, it has enough real users online to care about all this, while many of these users are actual paid users unwilling (or even unable) to leave since they don't know of anything else they could use (perhaps they are not fully convinced about beBee!). All this inevitably makes LI still useful since a post there is bound to attract more eyeballs than any other SM geared towards professionals (although Twitter is also a worthwhile possibility).
After doing a 4-month detox of LI, I started using it again, but not in the same way as I used to. Now, I merely enlarge my network there and directly communicate with people who have something to say. Apparently if you use LI for that purpose only, the toxic effects of the platform are mitigated. After all, I don't have time to read the moronic comments that often follow the posts of this or the other self-proclaimed guru, a situation resembling a cult more than a professional networking group. Also, I don't have the energy to argue with the various fanatics who still confuse Machine Learning with A.I. and would rather listen to their influencer of choice just because he posts a pretty image to support his view, rather than listen to someone who has done a PhD on the topic in one of the top universities in the continent.
Maybe that's the way things evolve in the SM realm and I was just too naive to think that something that had value would continue to do so after a few years. Whatever the case, I'm glad LI has started to fade, as this creates an evident void that is being filled by other, more quality-oriented, SM platforms that care more about their users than KPIs or whatever it is that LI cares about. Perhaps once LI's managers realise the inevitable demise of their platform, they'll start imitating some other social medium and improve their platform. Hopefully they'll make a good choice this time!
Articoli di Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris
Visualizza il blogOverview · Lately, many professionals in the data world offer mentor and consult services. Oftentime ...
My team and I are working on an educational venture for data matters. Nothing too technical but some ...
Overview · Mentoring is one of those subjects I can talk about till the cows come home (the other su ...
Professionisti correlati
Potresti essere interessato a questi lavori
-
IT Supply Chain Project Manager
Trovato in: Jooble IT O C2 - 6 giorni fa
AMARIS GROUP SA Roma, ItaliaIT Supply Chain Project Manager - Ibrido Permanent Job · Who are we? Job description Unisciti al nostro team di Amaris a Milano e diventa il prossimo IT Supply Chain Project Manager , con un approccio di lavoro ibrido. · Cosa Farai? · Collaborare con gli stakeholder per gestire p ...
-
It Functional Analyst
Trovato in: Buscojobs IT C2 - 2 giorni fa
Mantu Group Sa Biella, ItaliaWho are we?Amaris Consulting is an independent technology consulting firm providing guidance and solutions to businesses. With more than 1,000 clients across the globe, we have been rolling out solutions in major projects for over a decade – this is made possible by an internatio ...
-
IT Supply Chain Project Manager
Trovato in: Jooble IT O C2 - 2 ore fa
MANTU GROUP SA Milano, ItaliaIT Supply Chain Project Manager - Ibrido · Permanent Job · Who are we? Who are we? · Amaris Consulting is an independent technology consulting firm providing guidance and solutions to businesses. With more than 1,000 clients across the globe, we have been rolling out solutions ...
Commenti
stephan metral 🐝 Innovative Brand Ambassador
5 anni fa #20
Phil Friedman
5 anni fa #19
I don't know about your core business, Claire L Cardwell, but an incredibly large number of marine industry people, including C-suite execs, are on LinkedIn. And what I have found is that LI's strongest value is in enabling one to bypass the secretarial gatekeepers and reach directly to make contact with decision makers who would otherwise be inaccessible to a cold contact. I find that, if you have a full profile with photo illustrated samples of prior work and an archive of industry-relevant articles, an invite to connect is often answered in the affirmative. Then a short message asking for a short telephone appointment to pitch an idea you've been "kicking around" (not too much info in the message is the key to creating curiosity) often results in a one-on-one telephone conversation. I agree that, unless you're a life coach or an online psychic reader, you're unlikely to actually "do business" on LI. But if handled properly, it can help get you into the door, figuratively speaking, to make your pitch. Cheers!
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris
5 anni fa #18
Well, that's what happens when a SM platform tries to mimic FB :-)
Lada 🏡 Prkic
5 anni fa #17
Lada 🏡 Prkic
5 anni fa #16
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris
5 anni fa #15
Bill Stankiewicz
5 anni fa #14
Great points here I agree Ali
Bill Stankiewicz
5 anni fa #13
Javier Cámara-Rica 🐝🇪🇸
5 anni fa #12
Phil Friedman
5 anni fa #11
Phil Friedman
5 anni fa #10
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris
5 anni fa #9
Perhaps they just don't care any more. Hopefully one day enough people realize that and decide to reciprocate the sentiment (or lack thereof), migrating to other SM platforms...
Neil Smith
5 anni fa #8
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris
5 anni fa #7
That's a good point, Kim. It seems that as far as content is concerned, LI is the digital equivalent of tabloids :-)
Neil Smith
5 anni fa #6
Pascal Derrien
5 anni fa #5
indeed that said I still get business out of it because this is the business persona I promote over there as a recruitment marketing agency I cannot even consider beBee as a tool I need to invest in and that's the reality but I enjoy promoting my other persona :-)
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris
5 anni fa #4
You are absolutely right, Pascal. LI is not a publishing platform any more and we all ought to adjust our expectations accordingly. Yet, many people still publish on it and a zero is turned to a hero, because the LI users who don't know any better choose to engage with those "content creators." That's why there are so many marsh-mellow-y posts there, saying things that no-one could ever disagree with, since the LI users that follow these "content creators" like to have their ears caressed with nice things, while anything that is even remotely critical of something else is viewed as negative and therefore bad. That's why it's probably best to approach this social medium with detachment, focusing only on recruitment and stuff, rather than content.
Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris
5 anni fa #3
I agree that something shared on LI gets more attention. The fact that there are more users there alludes to that, while it's also quite likely that your network there is larger than your network on beBee. However, I think it's good to distinguish between engagement and useful engagement. LI may get many people engaged in an article, fetching many likes and shares but is anything really accomplished this way? I find the creation of meaningful connections here on beBee better than that of LI, even if the numbers in beBee are smaller. I guess it all depends on what someone is after.
Pascal Derrien
5 anni fa #2
Ali Anani
5 anni fa #1